
In 1947 the term Soda, Pop and Coke (which confusingly refers to all soft drinks, not just Coca Cola) were all fairly even distributed in the United States.
Over time the term Soda has become increasingly more common, most likely due to the influence of media in both California and New York.
That said, the map above likely overstates the change somewhat based on survey data from PopVsSoda.com

The come from The Pop vs Soda Page which is a web-based project to plot the regional variations in the use of the terms “Pop” and “Soda” to describe carbonated soft drinks.
Here’s what they current survey results show by US State & Canadian Province:
| State/Province | Pop | Soda | Coke | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 157,659 | 164,145 | 58,490 | 21,120 | 401,414 | 100.00% |
| Alabama | 153 | 582 | 2849 | 665 | 4249 | 1.06% |
| Alaska | 324 | 636 | 60 | 92 | 1112 | 0.28% |
| Alberta | 2185 | 69 | 55 | 48 | 2357 | 0.59% |
| American Samoa | 8 | 11 | 1 | 40 | 60 | 0.01% |
| Arizona | 586 | 2799 | 437 | 174 | 3996 | 1.00% |
| Arkansas | 154 | 347 | 1442 | 80 | 2023 | 0.50% |
| British Columbia | 2657 | 133 | 50 | 85 | 2925 | 0.73% |
| California | 925 | 20119 | 2892 | 1941 | 25877 | 6.45% |
| Colorado | 2909 | 1943 | 327 | 183 | 5362 | 1.34% |
| Connecticut | 70 | 4273 | 102 | 115 | 4560 | 1.14% |
| Delaware | 24 | 699 | 41 | 29 | 793 | 0.20% |
| District of Columbia | 35 | 442 | 57 | 40 | 574 | 0.14% |
| Florida | 344 | 5400 | 3642 | 1921 | 11307 | 2.82% |
| Georgia | 140 | 1425 | 4933 | 410 | 6908 | 1.72% |
| Guam | 6 | 19 | 7 | 30 | 62 | 0.02% |
| Hawaii | 35 | 673 | 36 | 76 | 820 | 0.20% |
| Idaho | 954 | 520 | 63 | 123 | 1660 | 0.41% |
| Illinois | 16400 | 7267 | 885 | 572 | 25124 | 6.26% |
| Indiana | 5591 | 1485 | 1989 | 363 | 9428 | 2.35% |
| Iowa | 6295 | 1227 | 67 | 173 | 7762 | 1.93% |
| Kansas | 2960 | 934 | 342 | 253 | 4489 | 1.12% |
| Kentucky | 1251 | 692 | 2248 | 329 | 4520 | 1.13% |
| Louisiana | 81 | 375 | 2739 | 597 | 3792 | 0.94% |
| Maine | 35 | 1418 | 21 | 74 | 1548 | 0.39% |
| Manitoba | 382 | 30 | 52 | 141 | 605 | 0.15% |
| Maryland | 208 | 5127 | 677 | 218 | 6230 | 1.55% |
| Massachusetts | 115 | 5874 | 240 | 1883 | 8112 | 2.02% |
| Michigan | 20493 | 10894 | 232 | 398 | 32017 | 7.98% |
| Minnesota | 11627 | 1745 | 119 | 311 | 13802 | 3.44% |
| Mississippi | 74 | 184 | 1435 | 102 | 1795 | 0.45% |
| Missouri | 1948 | 6733 | 541 | 230 | 9452 | 2.35% |
| Montana | 1061 | 284 | 37 | 73 | 1455 | 0.36% |
| Nebraska | 3045 | 661 | 54 | 119 | 3879 | 0.97% |
| Nevada | 119 | 849 | 136 | 52 | 1156 | 0.29% |
| New Brunswick | 509 | 21 | 14 | 9 | 553 | 0.14% |
| New Hampshire | 18 | 1428 | 34 | 255 | 1735 | 0.43% |
| New Jersey | 135 | 8306 | 263 | 201 | 8905 | 2.22% |
| New Mexico | 95 | 493 | 754 | 79 | 1421 | 0.35% |
| New York | 7607 | 16671 | 489 | 525 | 25292 | 6.30% |
| Newfoundland | 125 | 21 | 20 | 63 | 229 | 0.06% |
| North Carolina | 228 | 2671 | 1843 | 1008 | 5750 | 1.43% |
| North Dakota | 1136 | 253 | 15 | 25 | 1429 | 0.36% |
| Northwest Territories | 19 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 36 | 0.01% |
| Nova Scotia | 837 | 43 | 10 | 16 | 906 | 0.23% |
| Nunavut | 9 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 34 | 0.01% |
| Ohio | 19487 | 3082 | 450 | 490 | 23509 | 5.86% |
| Oklahoma | 1687 | 692 | 1486 | 151 | 4016 | 1.00% |
| Ontario | 6598 | 205 | 214 | 265 | 7282 | 1.81% |
| Oregon | 3086 | 1903 | 188 | 179 | 5356 | 1.33% |
| Pennsylvania | 13089 | 11395 | 331 | 450 | 25265 | 6.29% |
| Prince Edward Island | 115 | 9 | 1 | 18 | 143 | 0.04% |
| Puerto Rico | 6 | 85 | 88 | 47 | 226 | 0.06% |
| Quebec | 128 | 164 | 158 | 309 | 759 | 0.19% |
| Rhode Island | 15 | 934 | 16 | 43 | 1008 | 0.25% |
| Saskatchewan | 565 | 21 | 24 | 31 | 641 | 0.16% |
| South Carolina | 60 | 880 | 1283 | 237 | 2460 | 0.61% |
| South Dakota | 1152 | 313 | 22 | 32 | 1519 | 0.38% |
| Tennessee | 226 | 892 | 3656 | 323 | 5097 | 1.27% |
| Texas | 361 | 4813 | 14494 | 906 | 20574 | 5.13% |
| Utah | 858 | 1096 | 161 | 137 | 2252 | 0.56% |
| Vermont | 19 | 679 | 9 | 56 | 763 | 0.19% |
| Virgin Islands | 12 | 23 | 3 | 16 | 54 | 0.01% |
| Virginia | 562 | 5066 | 1457 | 620 | 7705 | 1.92% |
| Washington | 6772 | 3059 | 213 | 286 | 10330 | 2.57% |
| West Virginia | 1555 | 488 | 240 | 88 | 2371 | 0.59% |
| Wisconsin | 3410 | 8751 | 87 | 438 | 12686 | 3.16% |
| Wyoming | 463 | 150 | 74 | 318 | 1005 | 0.25% |
| Yukon | 30 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 57 | 0.01% |
It should be noted that Soda slightly edges out Pop based on the current survey data, but this could be down more to who filled in the survey than actual everyday usage.
Here’s a breakdown of their origins and why they became dominant in specific areas, considering the map you provided:
1. “Pop”
- Origin: The term “pop” likely originated from the sound made when opening a bottle of soda. It became popular in the mid-19th century and is often credited to its use in English-speaking countries like the UK and the US.
- Dominant Regions:
- Northern US: States in the Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and parts of the Great Lakes region primarily use “pop.”
- Why?: This term likely spread due to the influence of British and Northern European settlers in these regions. It was further reinforced by the marketing and distribution of soft drinks from regional bottlers that adopted the term.
2. “Soda”
- Origin: “Soda” comes from “soda water,” the fizzy water that was originally carbonated with sodium bicarbonate in the early days of the soft drink industry. The term was common in the northeastern US and tied to the soda fountains that became iconic in urban centers.
- Dominant Regions:
- Northeast, West Coast, and parts of the Southwest: The term “soda” is widely used in urbanized and coastal areas.
- Why?: These regions were influenced by early urbanization, soda fountains, and Italian immigrants who referred to similar drinks as “soda.” The term spread and stuck in areas with significant urban and cultural hubs.
3. “Coke”
- Origin: “Coke” became a generic term for carbonated drinks in the South due to the overwhelming influence of The Coca-Cola Company, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Coca-Cola was one of the earliest and most successful soft drink brands in the US, leading people in the South to use “coke” generically.
- Dominant Regions:
- Southeastern US: This term is most common in the Southern states, where Coca-Cola’s dominance in the beverage industry began.
- Why?: The cultural and economic influence of Coca-Cola in the South was so strong that it became synonymous with soft drinks in general, regardless of brand.
Why the Shifts in Usage?
- Mobility and Migration: Increased movement of people across the country has blended regional linguistic preferences.
- Media Influence: National advertising campaigns often use “soda,” which helps spread the term to new areas.
- Cultural Change: Younger generations may adopt terms based on pop culture or perceived modernity, shifting away from older regional terms.
- Globalization: The term “soda” aligns more with international terminology, which may influence its growth in usage.
What about Soda Pop?
The term “soda pop” is a combination of the words “soda” and “pop” and has been used as a way to describe carbonated beverages in a more general or inclusive manner. Here’s some context about the term:
1. Origins of “Soda Pop”
- “Soda”: Refers to the carbonated water component, originally made with sodium bicarbonate.
- “Pop”: Refers to the sound made when opening a bottle or can of carbonated drinks.
- The combination of “soda pop” likely originated as a way to describe carbonated beverages comprehensively, combining two common descriptors from different regions.
2. Use and Spread
- The term “soda pop” was more common in the early 20th century when the beverage industry was still relatively young, and different terms competed for dominance.
- It was used in advertising, bottling, and general conversation to describe the product in a way that could appeal to broader audiences.
3. Why Didn’t “Soda Pop” Dominate?
- Regional Preferences: Over time, regional identities solidified around simpler terms like “soda,” “pop,” or “coke,” making “soda pop” sound overly formal or outdated.
- Efficiency: People tend to prefer shorter terms in casual speech, and “soda pop” is longer and less efficient than either “soda” or “pop.”
- Cultural Shifts: As media and advertising favored one term over others in specific regions, “soda pop” became less common, often sounding old-fashioned or quaint.
4. Modern Usage
- Today, “soda pop” is less common in everyday conversation but still understood universally across the United States.
- It is sometimes used in nostalgic contexts or as a way to emphasize the traditional roots of the beverage industry.
- The term may also appear in more formal writing or when describing carbonated beverages in a generic way that avoids regional bias.
Regional and Historical Associations
- While “soda pop” was never strongly associated with any one region, its components (“soda” and “pop”) split regionally, as reflected in the dominance of “pop” in the Midwest and “soda” on the coasts.
What do you call it?








David Stear says
Soda is something for baking, Pop is a carbonated soft drink…end of story.