Brilliant Maps

Making Sense Of The World, One Map At A Time

  • BOOK!
  • Newsletter
  • Board Games
  • Posters
  • Scratch Maps

The Roman Empire vs. The Mongol Empire At Their Respective Peaks

January 10, 2020 19 Comments

The Roman Empire vs. The Mongol Empire At Their Respective Peaks

Map created by reddit user GalXE106

The map above shows how big the Roman and Mongol Empires were at their respective peaks. The Mongols had the world’s largest contiguous land based Empire in history (and the second largest overall after the British), but just how much bigger was it than Rome?

  • Mongol Empire: 24 million km2 (9.27 million mi2), 17.81% of world land area in 1270 or 1309
  • Roman Empire: 5.0 million km2 (1.93 million mi2), 3.71% of world land area in 117

Here are a few books on the two Empires:

  • The Mongol Conquests: A Captivating Guide to the Invasions and Conquests Initiated by Genghis Khan That Created the Vast Mongol Empire
  • Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World
  • SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome
  • The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: Volumes 1-3 of 6 (Everyman’s Library)

Here are some other maps of the two empires:

  • What If the Mongol Empire Reunited….?
  • An Incredibly Detailed Map of the Roman Empire At Its Height in 211AD
  • Roman Empire GDP Per Capita Map Shows That Romans Were Poorer Than Any Country in 2015
  • Travel Time from Ancient Rome
  • Countries Which Have At Some Point Claimed To Be Rome’s Successor
  • A View Of Roman Carthage, Built on the Site of the Previously Destroyed Punic Capital
  • Roman City of Londinium Around AD 200
  • The British Empire At Its Territorial Peak Covered Nearly The Same Area As The Moon

Find this map interesting the please share with a friend:

Filed Under: World Maps

Comments

  1. Chris Walker says

    January 11, 2020 at 6:19 am

    Land means nothing, how many roman roads, aquaducts and other engineering feats still stand today vs Mongols?

    Reply
    • Hephaestis says

      February 4, 2020 at 4:52 pm

      Exactly. When Britain or Spain ruled the waves, did the area of the Atlantic Ocean het included in their empires?

      Reply
    • Augusta says

      June 17, 2020 at 7:12 am

      Isn’t Genghis Khan supposedly related to three percent of all humans or so?
      That is absolutely a legacy, of a kind.

      Reply
  2. JS says

    January 11, 2020 at 5:14 pm

    The Mongol empire was certainly larger by far than the Roman empire, but only lasted around a century. The Roman empire of course lived more than 10 times as long.

    Reply
    • Marco says

      April 22, 2020 at 2:55 pm

      They should call it “the Mongolian expansion”, not empire…

      Reply
  3. Ethan Staubach says

    January 11, 2020 at 9:18 pm

    What are debating “biggest” on though. Mongol empire had most land, but Roman empire had larger percentage of the world population.

    Reply
  4. Artur says

    January 15, 2020 at 6:17 pm

    It is interesting that conflicts are still ongoing in the marked areas.

    Reply
  5. David Staye says

    February 8, 2020 at 11:47 am

    while the romans reigned over cities and civilisations, the mongol reigned over cattle and empty fields.

    Reply
    • Jun says

      April 13, 2020 at 5:37 am

      Thats untrue.

      Reply
    • Alan says

      June 28, 2020 at 10:53 am

      The Mongol Empire ruled over 110 million people between 1270 and 1309 — more than 25% of the world’s population. This included China, which was the most advanced civilisation in the world in both the sciences and arts.

      Europe at the time of the Roman Empire consisted mainly of small towns and tribes.

      Reply
  6. Slava says

    April 23, 2020 at 7:32 pm

    The Mongols were way more developed than the Romans. Plus, of how much territory it took, I thing the Mongols would win.

    Reply
  7. Malek says

    November 20, 2020 at 7:14 pm

    That is because the roman empire came in a time that the world was all primitive in comparison to it there were no arabic and islamic empires yet and their enemies did not have much of numbers or military technology while in the case of the mongols there were many civil wars because of its size and muslim empires around it like the maemluke and the beylik turkic sultanate were attacking it all the time and you need to take in yhought that the mongol empire changed to islam which ended their unity with each other and was overthrown by the timurids which used the civil wars and external wars with ottomans and mameluks to its benefit. So you really cannot compare them to each other. The mongols are far stronger and the evidence is I mean just look at the landmass they took and the fact that both byzantines and europes served it being afraid of being raided and conquered.

    Reply
  8. Galen Marek says

    January 1, 2021 at 1:22 am

    Mongolians,their proficiency in archery and versatility would be too much for the Romans .The roman empire last longer however,that doesn’t prove anything as they could barely contain the Gauls and expand further into middle east or Germania. Sorry but Mongolians are far more superior and the Romans pale in comparison to the Mongolians.

    Reply
  9. doug says

    February 21, 2021 at 9:08 pm

    The Roman Republic/Empire was vast with wealth, and had a centralized location for a thousand years.
    Rome also had superior government… the first to create a republic… which means a leader or even a whole branch of government destroyed… Rome still goes on… as the government was spread out over local towns, the senate, the magistrates and later the emperor.

    Ghengis Khan was the main reason behind the Mongol expansion… One guy, not an elaborate spread out republic.

    Rome can wear people down.
    As a friend gladiator said to spartacus after celebrating the defeat of a roman Legion..
    “Why do you celebrate. The roman machine will continue to send more legions, and more legions until we are whittled down to nothing”.

    The power of rome was the military in some aspects, but also as I said its government and the ability to move forward for a thousand years.

    Reply
  10. Élodie says

    February 23, 2021 at 1:35 pm

    Gotta love the Roman empire fanboys 🙄 especially the one saying that “Roman empire had larger percentage of the world population” and “the mongol reigned over cattle and empty fields” while freaking CHINA is included in the Mongol empire. Ethnocentrism at its finest !

    Reply
  11. Garek says

    March 4, 2021 at 7:40 pm

    Mongols = 65% Due to the bigger army and their Fighting Strategy
    Ancient Rome = 35% Due to small army and Better fighting strategy

    Reply
  12. AA says

    May 9, 2021 at 7:09 pm

    Mongols didn’t build anything, just took it or destroyed it. Europe romanised culture has taken all the world, every Asian culture has followed their model.

    Reply
  13. Bc says

    May 9, 2021 at 7:28 pm

    Mongols : 1206 to 1368 (1.5 centuries)
    Romans : 753 BC to 1453 (22 centuries)

    Reply
  14. V.W. says

    November 8, 2021 at 3:49 pm

    Not trying to take sides in the “Mongols VS Rome” debate going on here. This may be the fault of the original poster for prompting such a comparison, but it’s really an “apples and oranges” kind of a debate.
    What I do think is missing from this data, though, is population figures.
    From what I can determine, Rome governed about 70 million people, which at the time was 21% of the global population, whereas the Mongols governed about 110 million people, which at the time was 25% of the global population.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


World Atlas · Settlers of Catan · Risk · Game of Thrones · Coloring Books · Globes
Monopoly · Star Wars · Game of Life · Pandemic · Ticket To Ride · Drinks Cabinets
Copyright © 2022 · Privacy Policy · Fair Use, Attribution & Copyright · Contact Us
Follow Us: E-mail · Twitter · Facebook · Pinterest · Flipboard