Brilliant Maps

Making Sense Of The World, One Map At A Time

  • BOOK!
  • Newsletter
  • Board Games
  • Posters
  • Scratch Maps

Least Useful (And Vaguely Racist) Ethnic Map Ever

September 1, 2015 6 Comments

Least Useful (And Vaguely Racist) Ethnic Map Ever

Map from the 1911 Historical Atlas by William R. Shepherd

The map above is possibly one of the least useful (and also vaguely racist) ethnic maps ever created. Titled “Present Distribution of Europeans, Chinese, Japanese and Negroes,” it was published in William R. Shepherd’s 1911 Historical Atlas.

Essentially the map boil down the world into three ethnic groups: Europeans, Chinese and Japanese (because they view themselves as the same…) and Negroes. There are so many things wrong with the map that it’s difficult to know where to begin.

For one, it leaves out the majority of the world’s peoples such as Indians, Arabs, Persians, Indigenous peoples, etc., erasing them from the map. For groups that are included, they’re all just lumped together as if they’re the same.

Finally, the map is Eurocentric in the extreme. It vastly overstates the share of people of European ancestry living abroad. For example, if you only used this map as your point of reference, you’d think that all of coastal India and Indonesia were filled with Europeans.

Of course, all mapmakers have to choose what to include and exclude from the maps they make. Unfortunately, so much is excluded, and what’s included is highly suspect, that this map is at best useless in telling you about how the world looked in 1911.

This a shame because many of the other maps from the book are fascinating. You can have a look at them on the Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection for free.

Notice anything else strange about this map? Leave your comments below:

Filed Under: World Maps

Comments

  1. erik smit says

    September 3, 2015 at 9:49 am

    I am wondering what all the unexplained colors are supposed to mean…

    Reply
  2. Christian Beiwinkel says

    February 23, 2016 at 2:53 pm

    About 50 years later, German Geographer Albert Kolb published a map showing the 10 different “cultural worlds” (Europe, Russia, North America, Latin America, Orient, Black Africa, Eastern Asia, Southern Asia, Southeastern Asia and Australia). You would think that in those 50 years, geographers would be able to produce more differentiating maps depicting the world’s different cultures. And then, another 40 years passed and Sam Huntington based an entire book (“The Clash of Civilizations”) on that same idea of cultural worlds. This book is now one of the most read books at colleges across the United States… just a little reminder about how far we’ve gotten since this “vaguely racist” map was published.

    Reply
  3. DHW says

    January 19, 2020 at 5:32 pm

    Turn the virtue signaling down to a dull roar, guys.

    Reply
  4. Disappointed says

    August 16, 2020 at 8:19 am

    The map is literally titled “distribution of those 4 groups” not every ethnic division, this is a lazy article and I think less of your site for publishing it.

    Reply
  5. Kanzelor says

    November 29, 2020 at 10:03 pm

    Thanks for nothing. And I’m not talking about the map.

    Reply
  6. Sad says

    March 17, 2022 at 6:53 pm

    bruh the map was trying it’s best for the time.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


World Atlas · Settlers of Catan · Risk · Game of Thrones · Coloring Books · Globes
Monopoly · Star Wars · Game of Life · Pandemic · Ticket To Ride · Drinks Cabinets
Copyright © 2023 · Privacy Policy · Fair Use, Attribution & Copyright · Contact Us
Follow Us: E-mail · Twitter · Facebook · Pinterest · Flipboard