The map above shows New Hampshire and Australian Capital Territory side by side at exactly the same scale, using equal-area projections, so their true relative sizes are preserved.
New Hampshire vs Australian Capital Territory Geography
Land area
- New Hampshire has a land area of 8,954 square miles (23,190 km²), while Australian Capital Territory has 910 square miles (2,358 km²).
- New Hampshire's land area is 9.8 times (883%) larger than Australian Capital Territory's.
Total area
- New Hampshire: 9,350 square miles (24,216 km²) vs Australian Capital Territory: 910 square miles (2,358 km²), including inland and coastal water.
- New Hampshire's total area is 10.3 times larger than Australian Capital Territory's.
Length
- New Hampshire is 180 miles (290 km) long from north to south; Australian Capital Territory is 54 miles (87 km).
- New Hampshire's north-south length is 3.3 times (233%) longer than Australian Capital Territory's.
Width
- New Hampshire spans 95 miles (152 km) east to west; Australian Capital Territory spans 38 miles (61 km).
- New Hampshire's east-west width is 2.5 times (150%) wider than Australian Capital Territory's.
Highest point
- New Hampshire's highest point is Mount Washington at 6,277 feet (1,913 m); Australian Capital Territory's is Bimberi Peak at 6,273 feet (1,912 m).
- Mount Washington is 4 feet higher than Bimberi Peak.
Lowest point
- New Hampshire's lowest point is Atlantic Ocean at 0 feet; Australian Capital Territory's is Molonglo River at 1,407 feet.
- New Hampshire's lowest point is 1,407 feet lower.
New Hampshire vs Australian Capital Territory Population and History
Population
- New Hampshire has a population of 1,409,032 (2024), while Australian Capital Territory has 486,231 (2025).
- New Hampshire's population is 2.9 times (190%) larger than Australian Capital Territory's.
Population density
- New Hampshire: 157.4 people per square mile vs Australian Capital Territory: 534.3.
- Australian Capital Territory's population density is 3.4 times (239%) higher than New Hampshire's.
Largest metro area
- New Hampshire's largest metropolitan area is Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area (5,025,517 people) vs Australian Capital Territory's Greater Canberra (486,231).
- Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area's population is 10.3 times larger than Greater Canberra's.
History
- New Hampshire: Admitted to the Union on June 21, 1788, as the 9th state.
- Australian Capital Territory: Established as the Federal Capital Territory on January 1, 1911.
- In its current form, New Hampshire is the older of the two by 123 years.
New Hampshire vs Australian Capital Territory Economy
GDP
- New Hampshire's GDP is $119.3 billion (2024) vs Australian Capital Territory's $38.0 billion.
- New Hampshire's economic output is 3.1 times (214%) larger than Australian Capital Territory's.
GDP per capita
- New Hampshire: $84,694 per person vs Australian Capital Territory: $78,152.
- New Hampshire's GDP per capita is 1.1 times (8%) higher than Australian Capital Territory's.
Official Websites
New Hampshire official website · Australian Capital Territory official website
Download the New Hampshire vs Australian Capital Territory Size Comparison Map for free
To download the map, right-click the image above (or press and hold on a phone or tablet) and choose Save image as. The map is free to use anywhere, including on your own website or in print, as long as you credit it with a link back to this page or to BrilliantMaps.com.
More Size Comparisons
All New Hampshire size comparisons · All Australian Capital Territory size comparisons
Area, elevation and boundary figures come from official national statistics and US Census Bureau and Natural Earth boundary data; US state population, economic, county and tax figures come from the US Census Bureau, the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Tax Foundation. Figures are rounded and for general reference.