The map above shows Indiana and New Hampshire side by side at exactly the same scale, using equal-area projections, so their true relative sizes are preserved.
Indiana vs New Hampshire Geography
Land area
- Indiana has a land area of 35,825 square miles (92,787 km²), while New Hampshire has 8,954 square miles (23,190 km²).
- Indiana's land area is 4.0 times (300%) larger than New Hampshire's.
Total area
- Indiana: 36,421 square miles (94,331 km²) vs New Hampshire: 9,350 square miles (24,216 km²), including inland and coastal water.
- Indiana's total area is 3.9 times (290%) larger than New Hampshire's.
Length
- Indiana is 276 miles (444 km) long from north to south; New Hampshire is 180 miles (290 km).
- Indiana's north-south length is 1.5 times (53%) longer than New Hampshire's.
Width
- Indiana spans 193 miles (310 km) east to west; New Hampshire spans 95 miles (152 km).
- Indiana's east-west width is 2.0 times (103%) wider than New Hampshire's.
Highest point
- Indiana's highest point is Hoosier Hill at 1,255 feet (383 m); New Hampshire's is Mount Washington at 6,277 feet (1,913 m).
- Mount Washington is 5,022 feet higher than Hoosier Hill.
Lowest point
- Indiana's lowest point is Ohio River at 330 feet; New Hampshire's is Atlantic Ocean at 0 feet.
- New Hampshire's lowest point is 330 feet lower.
Indiana vs New Hampshire Population and History
Population
- Indiana has a population of 6,924,275 (2024), while New Hampshire has 1,409,032 (2024).
- Indiana's population is 4.9 times (391%) larger than New Hampshire's.
Population density
- Indiana: 193.3 people per square mile vs New Hampshire: 157.4.
- Indiana's population density is 1.2 times (23%) higher than New Hampshire's.
Biggest city
- Indiana's biggest city is Indianapolis with 891,484 people; New Hampshire's is Manchester with 116,386.
- Indianapolis' population is 7.7 times (666%) larger than Manchester's.
Largest metro area
- Indiana's largest metropolitan area is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area (9,408,576 people) vs New Hampshire's Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area (5,025,517).
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area's population is 1.9 times (87%) larger than Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area's.
History
- Indiana: Admitted to the Union on December 11, 1816, as the 19th state.
- New Hampshire: Admitted to the Union on June 21, 1788, as the 9th state.
- In its current form, New Hampshire is the older of the two by 28 years.
Indiana vs New Hampshire Economy
GDP
- Indiana's GDP is $519.5 billion (2024) vs New Hampshire's $119.3 billion.
- Indiana's economic output is 4.4 times (335%) larger than New Hampshire's.
GDP per capita
- Indiana: $75,028 per person vs New Hampshire: $84,694.
- New Hampshire's GDP per capita is 1.1 times (13%) higher than Indiana's.
Average income
- Indiana: $64,077 vs New Hampshire: $83,192 average income per person (per capita personal income).
- New Hampshire's average income is 1.3 times (30%) higher than Indiana's.
Indiana vs New Hampshire Counties
Number of counties
- Indiana has 92 counties, while New Hampshire has 10.
- Indiana's county count is 9.2 times (820%) higher than New Hampshire's.
Biggest county by area
- Indiana's largest county is Allen County at 657 square miles; New Hampshire's is Coos County at 1,795 square miles.
- Coos County's land area is 2.7 times (173%) larger than Allen County's.
Smallest county by area
- Indiana: Ohio County (86 sq mi) vs New Hampshire: Strafford County (368 sq mi).
- Strafford County's land area is 4.3 times (326%) larger than Ohio County's.
Most populous county
- Indiana: Marion County (981,628 people) vs New Hampshire: Hillsborough County (430,462 people).
- Marion County's population is 2.3 times (128%) larger than Hillsborough County's.
Least populous county
- Indiana: Ohio County (5,996 people) vs New Hampshire: Coos County (31,094 people).
- Coos County's population is 5.2 times (419%) larger than Ohio County's.
Richest county
- Indiana: Hamilton County ($104,283 per capita income) vs New Hampshire: Rockingham County ($100,216).
- Hamilton County and Rockingham County have about the same income.
Poorest county
- Indiana: Miami County ($44,940 per capita income) vs New Hampshire: Coos County ($60,657).
- Coos County's income is 1.3 times (35%) richer than Miami County's.
Indiana vs New Hampshire Taxes
State income tax
- Indiana has a top income tax rate of 2.95%, while New Hampshire has no state income tax.
- Indiana's top rate is 2.95 percentage points higher.
Property tax
- Indiana: 0.74% effective rate vs New Hampshire: 1.46% of home value per year.
- New Hampshire's rate is 0.72 percentage points higher.
Sales tax
- Indiana: 7% combined state and average local rate vs New Hampshire: 0%.
- Indiana's combined rate is 7 percentage points higher.
Official Websites
Indiana official website · New Hampshire official website
Download the Indiana vs New Hampshire Size Comparison Map for free
To download the map, right-click the image above (or press and hold on a phone or tablet) and choose Save image as. The map is free to use anywhere, including on your own website or in print, as long as you credit it with a link back to this page or to BrilliantMaps.com.
More Size Comparisons
All Indiana size comparisons · All New Hampshire size comparisons
Area, elevation and boundary figures come from official national statistics and US Census Bureau and Natural Earth boundary data; US state population, economic, county and tax figures come from the US Census Bureau, the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Tax Foundation. Figures are rounded and for general reference.