Brilliant Maps

Making Sense Of The World, One Map At A Time

  • BOOK!
  • Newsletter
  • Board Games
  • Posters
  • Map Tools

Wisconsin vs South Australia Size Comparison Map

Click To Get My 10 Best Brilliant Maps For Free:
WISCONSIN VS SOUTH AUSTRALIAOverlaid at the same scaleWisconsin65,497 sq mi (169,636 km²)South Australia380,048 sq mi (984,321 km²)South Australia is 5.8 times (480%) larger than Wisconsin. brilliantmaps.com

The map above shows Wisconsin and South Australia side by side at exactly the same scale, using equal-area projections, so their true relative sizes are preserved.

Wisconsin vs South Australia Geography

Land area: Wisconsin has a land area of 54,168 square miles (140,294 km²), while South Australia has 380,048 square miles (984,321 km²). South Australia's land area is 7.0 times (602%) larger than Wisconsin's.

Total area: Wisconsin: 65,497 square miles (169,636 km²) vs South Australia: 380,048 square miles (984,321 km²), including inland and coastal water. South Australia's total area is 5.8 times (480%) larger than Wisconsin's.

Length: Wisconsin is 368 miles (593 km) long from north to south; South Australia is 1,078 miles (1,735 km). South Australia's north-south length is 2.9 times (193%) longer than Wisconsin's.

Width: Wisconsin spans 323 miles (521 km) east to west; South Australia spans 825 miles (1,328 km). South Australia's east-west width is 2.6 times (155%) wider than Wisconsin's.

Highest point: Wisconsin's highest point is Timms Hill at 1,946 feet (593 m); South Australia's is Mount Woodroffe at 4,708 feet (1,435 m). Mount Woodroffe is 2,762 feet higher than Timms Hill.

Lowest point: Wisconsin's lowest point is Lake Michigan at 577 feet; South Australia's is Lake Eyre at -49 feet. South Australia's lowest point is 626 feet lower.

Wisconsin vs South Australia Population and History

Population: Wisconsin has a population of 5,960,975 (2024), while South Australia has 1,908,182 (2025). Wisconsin's population is 3.1 times (212%) larger than South Australia's.

Population density: Wisconsin: 110.0 people per square mile vs South Australia: 5.0. Wisconsin's population density is 22.0 times higher than South Australia's.

Largest metro area: Wisconsin's largest metropolitan area is Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area (3,757,952 people) vs South Australia's Greater Adelaide (1,491,015). Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area's population is 2.5 times (152%) larger than Greater Adelaide's.

History: Wisconsin: Admitted to the Union on May 29, 1848, as the 30th state. South Australia: Became an Australian state at Federation on January 1, 1901; founded as a colony in 1836. In its current form, Wisconsin is the older of the two by 53 years.

Wisconsin vs South Australia Economy

GDP: Wisconsin's GDP is $453.3 billion (2024) vs South Australia's $100.2 billion. Wisconsin's economic output is 4.5 times (352%) larger than South Australia's.

GDP per capita: Wisconsin: $76,044 per person vs South Australia: $52,511. Wisconsin's GDP per capita is 1.4 times (45%) higher than South Australia's.

Official Websites

Wisconsin official website · South Australia official website

More Size Comparisons

All Wisconsin size comparisons · All South Australia size comparisons

Area, elevation and boundary figures come from official national statistics and US Census Bureau and Natural Earth boundary data; US state population, economic, county and tax figures come from the US Census Bureau, the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Tax Foundation. Figures are rounded and for general reference.


Product Reviews · World Atlas · Settlers of Catan · Risk · Game of Thrones · Coloring Books
Globes · Monopoly · Star Wars · Game of Life · Pandemic · Ticket To Ride · Drinks Cabinets
US Locations · UK Locations· Fleet Management
Copyright © 2026 · Privacy Policy · Fair Use, Attribution & Copyright · Contact Us
Follow Us: Newsletter · Facebook · Youtube · Twitter · Threads · BlueSky · LinkedIn · Instagram · Pinterest · Flipboard