2016 US Presidential Electoral Map If Only [X] Voted

That’s utter nonsense. Really, a poor attempt at a counterargument.

“amazing how you think that illegal and probably also legal immigrants
stand for democrats. You put everybody on the same [basket]… What you as republican should fear”

Ironically you’re accusing me of something I haven’t done and in the same breath doing that very thing yourself.

a) I never claimed that all immigrants are participating in the Democratic party’s attempt to corrupt democracy. I said that this trade (effectively a bribe) of nullifying the law in order to garner more votes works in communities that value ethnic solidarity more than national identity, fair play, or the rule of law.”

Perhaps you think that that all immigrants are members of such communities. I don’t think that. That would be silly. However, it’s even sillier to suggest that such communities don’t exist at all. That’s demonstrably false and the Democrats have been very blatant about pandering to them.

b) You’re assuming that because I am against sabotaging the law and creating an unjust immigration system where those who break the rules fare better than those who follow them, that I am a Republican. I’m not. Just because I am offended by some of the things one party does, does not mean that I am not offended by anything the other party does. I don’t like either of the two majority parties.

My main grievance with the Democrats is that I see them as engaging in tactics which subvert the law and violate the principle of democracy. One example is immigration, but a more important example is their enthusiasm for judicial activism. At the same time, I’m not a fan of the Republicans either.

My main objection to them is that I think that they are insufficiently concerned about the economic welfare of those who are worst off and for ideological reasons are unreasonably reticent about to interfere in the operation of free markets or spend more money even when that is the right and just thing to do to help those who are struggling and in poverty.

I don’t belong to any party. FWIW, in the last four presidential contests, I’ve voted for the Republican candidate twice, the Democratic candidate once, and a third party candidate once. Statistically at least, that makes me a great deal less partisan than the average American.

“Asians voted republican”

Asians haven’t voted republican since the 1990s.

Asians voted 87% Clinton. Who told you that they voted Republican, one of those “well 2% of blacks voted for David Duke in Louisiana’s Senate election polls” type losers who’ll do anything to make race seem irrelevant?

Some subgroups of Asians and Hispanics did vote Republican, and some minority-majority counties did vote Republican, but no race except white voted Republican.

That’s because you’re still closed-minded and don’t realize that they discriminate against white people and actual citizens. That’s what your case sounds like. Or maybe you’re lying.

Furthermore, there are already videotaped confessions regarding election-rigging in New York City because the normally much more massive margins of victory for Democrats there weren’t enough to push the whole popular vote nationwide. Of course, NYC alone isn’t big enough, however — that’d push turnout over 100% in all likelihood.

But California? They’ve got a huge population, and it’s reasonably left-wing. Of course, your ridiculous theory makes it so that the Democrats wouldn’t actually make gains in California — and here’s a hint. They did. They gained a variety of counties won by John McCain and Mitt Romney. In addition, turnout skyrocketed — and all for Clinton. Trump lost votes and Clinton gained over a million.

In other words, perhaps the routine violence that the Democrats use to silence Trump supporters in California (as they have done on camera many times) played a crucial role. Maybe the white voters were denied the right to vote. But somehow, turnout in California skyrocketed — entirely in favor of one candidate — while turnout went down for the other side. The only plausible way to explain this is that the party of violence and murder, the Democrats, used another Philadelphia 2008 or ACORN style plan (By the way, the last time Democrats got such good results in California was when ACORN fucked with the election results.) to reduce Republican turnout. We all know your “Trump got less votes than Romney.” lie only worked when the votes weren’t fully counted for the former. But you expect me to believe that, while Trump got two million votes more than Romney, Clinton would outperform Obama in California so much so that she would defeat Trump nationwide using only the gigantic margin of victory in one state where the Democrats have enough control to rig an election? Give me a break.

Plus, the Democrats were caught planning a scheme to use illegal voters to win the midterms using illegally-run SuperPACs (Way to go, you broke the few remaining laws on unregulated campaign organizations.) — without having been given time in advance, and they knew the intricate details of each state’s weaknesses in terms of preventative legislation to protect against them, getting as specific as to say that they could use the corporate IDs of illegal workers in Illinois (where they refuse to deport convicted murderers who have finished their sentences) to vote, and they could hire workers solely for the purpose of voting with them. Many of these Democratic big-shots are illegals, too. Hmm, perhaps they could be able to vote?

Of course, your skyrocketing turnout is occurring in a year where turnout was down, and your candidate got less votes than Obama got in 2012. But you continue to deny, correct?

So how bad does this have to be, man? Where do you stop and say “OK maybe in a country where an estimated 3% of the voters on our voter registrations are known to be dead, missing, non-citizens, etc., many registered voters don’t vote, one party specifically pushes for legislation against extra protections for the voting system, and those same politicians use the popular vote as a rationale to prevent anything from getting done in Congress, perhaps the 3% margin on the popular vote could be fraudulent. The possibility is large enough that this isn’t a good reason to hold up the passage of legislation and executive appointments.” (Yes, you’re still holding up executive appointments using the 1 or 2 Republicans you can bribe. Good job!) Where can you stop using this as a justification to screw with us, and mind your own business?

Never.

I’m sure that medications will make me left-wing like you.

If there is seriously such a medicine, I believe it may be reasonable to state its purpose is to control people’s behavior. Perhaps it’s “medical marijuana”? Yes, this could seriously dull your ability to think and cause Leftism.

Stop letting drugs control you.

California was recently ordered to stop obstructing justice, since they were refusing to present evidence of the suspected rigging of their election to sway the nationwide popular vote.

“That’s what you’re reduced to?”
“‘I know you are but what am I?'”

“Listen, you sound absolutely nuts”
You need to up your medications.